Class Gaps Poll: Online Appendix

Systematic toplines, subgroup cross-tabulations, and sample composition for the Abbott–Williams Class Gaps Poll. Support percentages are survey-weighted and use the same progressive-coding rules as the report (“Don’t know” kept in the denominator).

Overview

5,770U.S. adults
55survey questions tabulated
±1.4%full-sample MOE

This appendix accompanies the report Class Gaps: Tools for Building Progressive Coalitions by Bridging the Class Divide. For every survey question it reports the weighted share holding the progressive position, broken out by eight dimensions: class group, party ID, race/ethnicity, education, household income, gender, age, and 2024 presidential vote. The two class groups that anchor the report are Working class (middle 50% of income and no four-year degree; n = 1,704) and Liberal college graduates (Democratic-leaning, BA+, top income quartile; n = 617).

How to read the heat tables. Each cell is the weighted % choosing the progressive/supportive response, shaded from pale to teal. Hover a cell for its unweighted n; hover a column header for the full subgroup name. Tables scroll horizontally. “–” = subgroup too small / not estimable.
0%100% support

Methodology

  • Field dates: January 29–February 17, 2026. Fielded By: Verasight. Mode: online panel.
  • Sample: 5,770 U.S. adults—a 4,420 nationally representative base plus oversamples of 650 Black, 400 Hispanic/Latino, and 300 high-income adults.
  • Weighting: raked to December 2025 CPS targets (age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metro status), Pew NPORS partisanship, and 2024 presidential vote. Weight range 0.27–3.82 (mean 1.00).
  • Full-sample margin of error: ±1.4% (design-effect adjusted).
  • Coding: each question is scored for the share of respondents taking the progressive/supportive position, using a response scale appropriate to that question. “Don’t know” answers are kept in the denominator, so every percentage is a share of everyone who was asked the question, not only those who gave an opinion.
  • Framing experiment: most issue questions were randomized so that each respondent saw one of two wordings—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing. Both wordings, and how support differed between them, are shown in the “different wordings tested” panel under each issue.
  • Question wording: every question links to its full verbatim text—and every wording version it was tested in—in the Question wording section below.

Comparison survey sources

Throughout the report, the 2026 Class Gaps Poll is compared against a large set of pre-existing national surveys. This is the full list those comparisons draw on—the academic benchmark series (ANES, CES/CCES, GSS) plus prior public-opinion polling. All are publicly documented national surveys; the report uses only their published/derived aggregate results (no respondent-level data is redistributed here).

SurveyYear / waveOrganization
ANES Time Series2024American National Election Studies (U. Michigan / Stanford)
Cooperative Election Study (CES / CCES) Common Content2024Harvard / YouGov
General Social Survey (GSS)2024NORC at the University of Chicago
Pew American Trends Panel (ATP)—Waves 120, 125, 128, 129, 140, 146, 149, 1512022–2024Pew Research Center
AP VoteCast 2024 General Election2024AP-NORC / NORC at the University of Chicago
AP-NORC Center omnibus surveysJun, Aug, Dec 2023; Mar, Apr, Oct 2024; Jan 2025AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research
AP-NORC EPIC (Energy Policy Institute at Chicago)2024AP-NORC / EPIC at the University of Chicago
Gallup Poll Social Series (GPSS)Jan & Mar 2025 extractsGallup
PRRI American Values Survey (AVS)2023Public Religion Research Institute
Yale Climate Change in the American Mind (CCAM)Dec. 2024 (series 2008–2024)Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
Axios-Ipsos American Health Index, Wave 1 (AHI)Feb 2023Ipsos (via Roper Center, Cornell)
“Public Ranks Inflation as the Most Important Issue” survey (SSRS)Jul 2023SSRS (via Roper Center, Cornell)
KFF Health Tracking PollSep 2024KFF / SSRS (via Roper Center, Cornell)

“Wave” numbers (Pew ATP) and field dates (AP-NORC) identify the specific edition of a repeated survey. Items from these sources enter the report only as aggregate, progressive-coded support percentages for benchmarking the Class Gaps Poll; they are not part of its weighting or sample.

Sample & weighting

Unweighted counts and weighted shares for the realized sample. The oversamples make the unweighted race/income composition non-representative by design; the weighted column restores population proportions.

Sample component

Sample componentn (unwtd)Weighted %
US Adult4,42076.6%
Black65011.3%
Latino/Hispanic400 6.9%
High Income300 5.2%

Party ID

Party IDn (unwtd)Weighted %
Democrats2,06129.9%
Independents1,51628.0%
Republicans1,55730.6%

Race / ethnicity

Race / ethnicityn (unwtd)Weighted %
White (non-Hisp.)2,83959.4%
Black (non-Hisp.)1,15912.1%
Hispanic/Latino1,33318.7%
Asian (non-Hisp.)217 4.9%
Other / multiple222 4.9%

Education

Educationn (unwtd)Weighted %
HS or less1,72437.1%
Some college / Assoc.1,78526.3%
Bachelor's degree1,41322.8%
Postgraduate degree84813.7%

Household income

Household incomen (unwtd)Weighted %
Under $50k1,95128.0%
$50k-$100k2,11841.2%
$100k-$150k94717.4%
$150k+74313.2%

Gender

Gendern (unwtd)Weighted %
Women3,18151.0%
Men2,54948.3%

Age

Agen (unwtd)Weighted %
18-2982619.7%
30-441,63724.5%
45-642,08832.0%
65+1,20823.5%

2024 vote

2024 voten (unwtd)Weighted %
Harris '242,45237.2%
Trump '241,95438.4%
Other cand.266 4.5%
Did not vote / NA1,09819.9%

Region

Regionn (unwtd)Weighted %
Northeast1,05417.2%
Midwest1,09120.2%
South2,21838.5%
West1,35723.3%

Metro status

Metro statusn (unwtd)Weighted %
Metropolitan5,06385.5%
Non-metro65613.6%

Age (mean years)

Age (mean years)n (unwtd)mean
Mean5,75948.1

Immigration

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q40 Trump gone too far61569691662654747257566164696259616664577163595493267465
Q41 Biden vs Trump immigration403678773683358463835394448393842464336484137367763037
Q42 Open doors to immigrants56528480573250626757515460625454605956556657525280326153
Q43 Immigration helps economy55498977573551536451455564674755616352586153525680355545
Q44 Secure borders + legal status66619284685064687361606673746365717366667066666585507063
Q45 Legal status for long-term immigrants65619286674260697461586570726363677065647266616287437162
Q46 Rein in/abolish ICE56538684572649686756535658585754565759526659524885266258
The different wordings each Immigration question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q40 No frameTrump gone too far61569640
Q41 No frameBiden vs Trump immigration40367842
Q42 NOT WC-RESONANTOpen doors: Human rights imperative64619131
Q42 WC-RESONANTOpen doors: Working-class faith-and-family47447733
Q43 NOT WC-RESONANTImmigration economy: Raises GDP55499041
Q43 WC-RESONANTImmigration economy: Workers needed (mentions wage hurt)55498940
Q44 NOT WC-RESONANT 1Secure borders + legal status (PME1)65598829
Q44 NOT WC-RESONANT 2Secure borders + legal status (PME2)65569336
Q44 WC-RESONANTSecure borders + legal status (WC)68659328
Q45 NOT WC-RESONANT 1Legal status for long-term immigrants (PME1)57489345
Q45 NOT WC-RESONANT 2Legal status for long-term immigrants (PME2)59539239
Q45 WC-RESONANTLegal status for long-term immigrants (WC)71709222
Q46 NOT WC-RESONANTICE: Abolish (terrorizing communities)49477629
Q46 WC-RESONANTICE: Rein in (arresting hardworking immigrants)62599535

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

LGBTQ+ Rights

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q26 LGBT job/housing protection58548777613857566153515864675357636661556657565680396453
Q27 Gay/lesbian adoption64609283694163606656586369716062677267596864616286426961
Q28 Trans ID recognition45408071451941475140394350524343474946425845403972194443
Q29 Trans girls in sports27254747251224313327252830292826292729254030222144122526
The different wordings each LGBTQ+ Rights question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q26 NOT WC-RESONANTStrengthen LGBTQIA+ civil rights60589334
Q26 WC-RESONANTIllegal to fire/evict transgender56498233
Q26-alt NOT WC-RESONANTGender-affirming care: Allow for minors (oppose prohibition)44435512
Q26-alt WC-RESONANTGender-affirming care: Parents decide (oppose govt ban)46465610
Q27 NOT WC-RESONANTFull family equality60589235
Q27 WC-RESONANTGay/lesbian couples adopt67619231
Q28 NOT WC-RESONANTTrans ID: autonomy/dignity42377538
Q28 WC-RESONANTTrans ID: work/travel47438441
Q29 NOT WC-RESONANTFull inclusion/equality/dignity29285022
Q29 WC-RESONANTCoaches/families decide trans girls25224423

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

Guns

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q36 Universal background checks82809590827783778274768386877682868684807877838892777872
Q37 Ban high-capacity magazines63598981664662616852576268736063656868586459636783466458
Q38 Red flag laws82809589847984778174758488907882858982827676849191798372
Q39 Assault weapons ban59558677594459576249535764695658616563546055596380435753
The different wordings each Guns question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q36 NOT WC-RESONANTBackground checks: Address public health crisis83819515
Q36 WC-RESONANTBackground checks: Protect families from violence80799416
Q37 NOT WC-RESONANTBan high-cap mags: Semi-auto rifle massacres62569035
Q37 WC-RESONANTBan high-cap mags: Mass shootings in schools64628826
Q38 NOT WC-RESONANTRed flag: Courts remove guns from dangerous83799617
Q38 WC-RESONANTRed flag: Courts take guns from threats81819413
Q39 NOT WC-RESONANTAssault weapons ban: Confront toxic gun culture60579133
Q39 WC-RESONANTAssault weapons ban: Prohibit military-style rifles59548127

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

Abortion

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q57 Abortion access (any reason)59568984613254646556536062645757596662556661565485335759
Q58 Abortion up to 15 weeks56537272593853596050515857605454596058545755555674395554
The different wordings each Abortion question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q57 NOT WC-RESONANTAbortion any reason: Access for any reason53508534
Q57 WC-RESONANTAbortion any reason: Safe/legal, women decide64619332
Q58 NOT WC-RESONANT 1Abortion up to 15 weeks (PME1)52537118
Q58 NOT WC-RESONANT 2Abortion up to 15 weeks (PME2)52487122
Q58 WC-RESONANT 1Abortion up to 15 weeks (WC1)58557014
Q58 WC-RESONANT 2Abortion up to 15 weeks (WC2)60567923

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

Environment

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q30 100% clean energy by 205057548782593252686555545959625956575959556861545082326060
Q31 Modern energy system66638879675564667164606969726266697363696766666580556861
Q32 Clean energy (China framing)69668881715967687270627273766469727666726966697283596763
Q33 Clean power investments68659485715065717466617172766469707368687169686688507066
Q34 Prioritize marginalized/coal communities52497669514049575853455556614753546049565753505169406043
Q35 Rein in Big Oil61569179634459566363526468675461666859626259606381456352
Q59 Clean grid + nuclear + carbon capture60558172634959566257506267695260657052686158586374516351
Q60 Wind/solar grid61579183633957656862566163696060616561616763595784386560
The different wordings each Environment question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q30 NOT WC-RESONANT100% clean energy 2050: Eliminate fossil fuels55518635
Q30 WC-RESONANT100% clean energy 2050: Replace dirty fuels60578831
Q31 NOT WC-RESONANTModern energy: Limit global warming threat57518736
Q31 WC-RESONANTModern energy: Cut costs + good-paying jobs75759015
Q32 NOT WC-RESONANTModern energy: Beat China in technology59558631
Q32 WC-RESONANTModern energy: Cut costs + beat China79769014
Q33 NOT WC-RESONANTClean power: Energy efficiency investments62599333
Q33 WC-RESONANTClean power: Cut utility bills + create jobs74719524
Q34 NOT WC-RESONANTPrioritize: Marginalized/Black/brown communities42377234
Q34 WC-RESONANTPrioritize: Coal country + working-class communities62618120
Q35 NOT WC-RESONANTClimate action: Stop Big Oil externalizing costs57509141
Q35 WC-RESONANTClimate action: Rein in corporate profiteers65629129
Q59 NOT WC-RESONANTClean grid + nuclear + carbon capture (PME)61559035
Q59 WC-RESONANTClean grid + nuclear + carbon capture (WC)59557217
Q60 NOT WC-RESONANTWind/solar grid (PME)60549036
Q60 WC-RESONANTWind/solar grid (WC)62599233

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

Care Economy

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q54 Affordable childcare69699186685465757566677069717168686871667072696485536369
Q55 Universal pre-K70699086705766747768667271736870727071686972696986567066
Q56 Child tax credit74768685746773777872737674767474747575737678737284667372
The different wordings each Care Economy question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q54 NOT WC-RESONANTChildcare: Universal subsidized system56558530
Q54 WC-RESONANTChildcare: Affordable high-quality access81839613
Q55 NOT WC-RESONANTPre-K: Universal64638623
Q55 WC-RESONANTPre-K: Help kids succeed + parents work75769317
Q56 NOT WC-RESONANTChild tax credit: $8000 refundable73738310
Q56 WC-RESONANTChild tax credit: Help hardworking families76798910

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

Public Safety

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q47 More police in high-crime areas83828785858485768278798485898082888581867479879086848375
Q48 Targeted police + violence interrupters65647670666365616662586769706065696860695661677272646453
Q49 Mental health responders (not police)61608280614256706962616261606560595966567066605180416463
The different wordings each Public Safety question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q47 WC-RESONANTMore police in high-crime areas (WC)8382875
Q48 NOT WC-RESONANTViolence prevention: Police + community programs62627513
Q48 WC-RESONANTViolence prevention: Focus on small group causing most shootings68667712
Q49 NOT WC-RESONANTMental health: Shift funding from police55537421
Q49 WC-RESONANTMental health: Send specialists not police68679023

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

Democracy

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
Q50 Trump authoritarian/above law58549688642352696757525863675856606360567059555292247059
Q51 Trump ignores limits on power53499185581346696151495354625849525858485754525089126758
Q52 Trump uses govt against critics58539486622652666654515863675656626258576858565390257457
Q53 Trump ignores democratic rules60569490662754736858566063686059616562587062585393286961
The different wordings each Democracy question was tested in—working-class-resonant vs. not working-class-resonant framing (click to expand)
Q / wordingWording (short)AllWCLCGGap
Q50 NOT WC-RESONANTTrump: Authoritarian above the law57529643
Q50 WC-RESONANTTrump: Puts himself above the law60559641
Q51 NOT WC-RESONANTTrump: Disregard for presidential power limits52459146
Q51 WC-RESONANTTrump: Ignores limits on power54529139
Q52 NOT WC-RESONANTTrump: Uses state power against critics58529543
Q52 WC-RESONANTTrump: Uses govt against critics57539239
Q53 NOT WC-RESONANTTrump: Ignores democratic rules61559541
Q53 WC-RESONANTTrump: Ignores rules (economic harms)59589335

Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.

Baseline (ANES/CES/GSS-style)

The baseline battery is a set of standard policy questions drawn from long-running national surveys (the American National Election Studies, the Cooperative Election Study, and the General Social Survey), asked in their established wording. They serve two purposes: they benchmark this sample against well-known national results, and they provide the plain-wording comparison point for the working-class framing experiments used elsewhere in the survey.

Question (progressive-coded % support)OverallClassParty IDRace / ethnicityEducationHousehold incomeGenderAge2024 vote
AllWCLCGDemIndRepWhiteBlackHisp.Other≤HSSome col.BAPostgrad<$50k$50-100k$100-150k$150k+WomenMen18-2930-4445-6465+HarrisTrumpOtherNone
LGBT job discrimination65628878694965616559586470736064677167626966626281506860
Gay adoption66629284704466616954616670726363707570617170636287457065
Background checks89899894918691848883859092938690929292868487919495868884
Assault rifle ban56528577563854575942505460665354586161495651566078375248
Police permit for guns59577974584957596449545864685460626461575455596774485454
Universal basic income53565868533644746762625446396751434357496365533363374669
Trans athletes (oppose ban)31314141272832283133293232342931353131313631283240262827
Path to citizenship64638982664661627562586670706064696866627264626285467060
Infrastructure spending77759183777679707473698082847078818370847072798584777465
Expand Medicaid74769289745970858372777672688174687077717780776288577282
Corporate tax60598679634158626357576261636059626061595962615781416057
Medical bill help65677984644657817769706761577465585668627673645080466176
Border security (oppose)252148442452128322920252830222428272623352821184553324
Paid parental leave81829492827179848578808384798282808184788285827692727980
Tax millionaires73749589745872737667707574747275726974727372747291567471
Free trade (oppose)26272521263531181924212929282127312623301722293422352816
Raise minimum wage66718386664461817263716758627465605871606670685885445873
Welfare spending57568279573652716460605756546654525559556762554776345566
Environmental regulation64629280664763646658606567686263656866626563656284467161
Social Security spending71757780686871747270727569667373696469736067767978686866

Policy priorities (pairwise)

Each respondent saw 10 random pairs from 30 priorities and picked the more important one. Values are the share of head-to-head match-ups each priority won (higher = more prioritized).

Policy priorityAllWorking classLib. college gradsWC−LCG
Ensuring that basics—like groceries, housing, utilities, health insurance—are affordable848681+5
Protecting Social Security and Medicare747667+8
Lowering rents and housing costs687158+13
Reducing corruption in government666857+11
Lowering drug prices for the elderly and low-income people646653+13
Protecting subsidies that make health insurance affordable616368-5
Raising wages and take-home pay616454+9
Protecting Medicaid575956+3
Creating jobs565649+7
Lowering the crime rate to keep neighborhoods secure565938+22
Ensuring that every family has access to affordable childcare545358-5
Boosting economic growth545347+5
Making college and job training more affordable525151-0
Preventing gun violence524962-13
Protecting workers from unfair treatment at work515045+5
Cracking down on corporate price gouging505244+8
Ending racism495157-6
Resisting authoritarianism and defending democratic institutions484275-33
Ending police misconduct485045+5
Raising taxes on the rich434257-15
Creating universal pre-K so kids can get early education393743-6
Requiring employers to provide paid family leave393935+4
Protecting access to abortion383756-19
Reining in the power of Big Tech and other large companies363342-10
Improving public safety by adding more police363819+19
Securing the border363911+28
Addressing climate change343252-20
Protecting the rights of undocumented immigrants302942-13
Protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans282445-21
Ending sexism272629-2

Race × class

Two complementary race×class breakdowns: how much each group supports the progressive position on each issue, and how it prioritizes policies head-to-head.

Average issue support by race and class

Mean progressive-coded support within each race, for working-class (WC) vs. liberal-college-grad (Elite) respondents of that race. Diff = WC − Elite.

Issue#QWhite WCWhite EliteWhite diffLatino WCLatino EliteLatino diffBlack WCBlack EliteBlack diff
Abortion 250.882.0-31.362.085.5-23.463.372.5 -9.2
Care Economy 470.791.2-20.581.992.0-10.080.889.6 -8.8
Democracy 444.795.5-50.867.896.4-28.669.088.1-19.1
Economic Policy1061.078.1-17.167.378.6-11.371.676.4 -4.8
Environment 753.289.1-35.964.687.6-23.164.180.3-16.2
Guns 766.691.6-25.072.390.6-18.266.784.0-17.3
Immigration 847.487.0-39.765.986.3-20.465.480.9-15.5
LGBT/Trans 749.779.8-30.154.777.2-22.648.859.8-11.1
Public Safety 367.284.0-16.973.884.9-11.172.875.1 -2.3

Issue priorities by race and class

The same head-to-head priority exercise as above, but with each race split into its working-class (WC) and liberal-college-grad (Elite) respondents. Values are the share of match-ups each priority won within that race×class group; Diff = WC − Elite. Higher = more prioritized. Sorted by White working-class priority.

Policy priorityWhite WCWhite EliteWhite diffLatino WCLatino EliteLatino diffBlack WCBlack EliteBlack diff
Ensuring that basics—like groceries, housing, utilities, health insurance—are affordable8678+88780+78283-1
Protecting Social Security and Medicare8073+86868-17358+15
Reducing corruption in government7160+116749+186662+4
Lowering drug prices for the elderly and low-income people7148+235961-16274-12
Lowering rents and housing costs6955+147559+167166+6
Protecting subsidies that make health insurance affordable6368-56668-26270-7
Lowering the crime rate to keep neighborhoods secure6132+295121+306366-2
Raising wages and take-home pay6052+86556+107061+9
Creating jobs6043+165148+35360-7
Protecting Medicaid5954+56070-105852+6
Boosting economic growth5741+164054-145562-7
Cracking down on corporate price gouging5642+145551+44142-0
Securing the border5210+432513+12249+15
Ensuring that every family has access to affordable childcare5256-55658-25356-3
Protecting workers from unfair treatment at work4842+75256-55251+1
Making college and job training more affordable4847+15264-125452+1
Preventing gun violence4564-195461-65159-8
Improving public safety by adding more police4418+263421+123219+12
Ending racism4254-125157-66866+2
Ending police misconduct4244-25147+56548+18
Raising taxes on the rich4159-183850-124352-9
Resisting authoritarianism and defending democratic institutions4183-424668-224358-15
Requiring employers to provide paid family leave3935+34326+163946-6
Creating universal pre-K so kids can get early education3543-83846-83947-9
Reining in the power of Big Tech and other large companies3546-113636+02730-4
Protecting access to abortion3460-253854-163940-0
Addressing climate change3160-293642-63042-12
Ending sexism2533-82517+83029+1
Protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans2249-282742-152527-2
Protecting the rights of undocumented immigrants2043-234453-93230+2

Question wording

Full verbatim text for every question above, including each wording version where the question was randomized. The wordings fall into two camps: a working-class-resonant framing (labeled WC-RESONANT) and not working-class-resonant framings (labeled NOT WC-RESONANT)—comprising the standard survey wording and an abstract, principle- or identity-based wording. Numbered variants (e.g. WC-RESONANT 1, NOT WC-RESONANT 1) are minor splits of the same wording. Each question heading above links here.

Immigration

Q40 Trump gone too far

No frameSome people say that President Trump has gone too far, with masked men arresting ordinary, hardworking people instead of just deporting criminals. Do you agree or disagree?

Q41 Biden vs Trump immigration

No frameIf you had to choose between President Biden's immigration policies and President Trump's, which would you choose?

Q42 Open doors to immigrants

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We have always been a nation of immigrants, and should allow the poor and persecuted to build a better life in the U.S. as a human rights imperative.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We need to open our doors wide to immigrants because most are working-class faith-and-family people who come here to work hard, pay taxes and contribute to their communities.

Q43 Immigration helps economy

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We need immigration because it raises the GDP, and growing the American economy makes the country richer.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? Though immigration may hurt wages in a few industries, a blanket ban is self-defeating because it leaves construction sites without laborers, small businesses without dishwashers, and nursing homes with no one to care for grandma.

Q44 Secure borders + legal status

NOT WC-RESONANT 1Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system protects our borders while upholding the human rights of our neighbors and letting them stay in their communities.
NOT WC-RESONANT 2Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system protects our borders while upholding the human rights of immigrants and letting them stay in their communities.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We need secure borders but immigrants should be allowed to stay if they have held jobs, paid taxes, contributed to their communities and stayed out of trouble.

Q45 Legal status for long-term immigrants

NOT WC-RESONANT 1Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system upholds the human rights of our neighbors and lets them stay in their communities.
NOT WC-RESONANT 2Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system upholds the human rights of immigrants and lets them stay in their communities.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? Immigrants who have held jobs, paid taxes, contributed to their communities and stayed out of trouble for years should be allowed to stay.

Q46 Rein in/abolish ICE

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We should abolish ICE because it's responsible for causing havoc in the streets, terrorizing American communities, and shooting and beating people with no remorse. ICE cannot be "reformed," only dismantled.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We should rein in and restructure federal immigration enforcement to put an end to masked government agents killing civilians and arresting hardworking immigrants who hold jobs, pay taxes, and contribute to their communities.

LGBTQ+ Rights

Q26 LGBT job/housing protection

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose strengthening civil-rights protections to eliminate discrimination against LGBTQIA+ people in employment and housing?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose making it illegal to fire someone or kick them out of their home because they're transgender?

Q27 Gay/lesbian adoption

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose guaranteeing full family equality and protect the parenting rights of LGBTQIA+ families?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose letting gay and lesbian couples adopt if they can give kids a stable, loving home?

Q28 Trans ID recognition

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor ensuring legal gender recognition for transgender people to affirm their autonomy and dignity?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose letting transgender adults update their driver's licenses and other IDs so their paperwork matches how they live, making it easier to work, travel and take care of business?

Q29 Trans girls in sports

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose protecting the full inclusion of transgender girls and women in sports as a matter of equality and basic human dignity?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose letting coaches and families decide whether it's fair for a child who was born male but lives as a girl to play on girls' teams when the child hasn't gone through male puberty and doesn't have the physical advantages boys typically have?

Guns

Q36 Universal background checks

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose requiring universal background checks to address the public-health crisis of gun violence?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose requiring background checks for every gun sale so families can send kids to school and know they'll be safe there?

Q37 Ban high-capacity magazines

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose banning high-capacity ammunition magazines for semi-automatic firearms to better protect communities from gun violence?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose banning high-capacity gun magazines that allow semi-automatic guns fire hundreds of rounds a minute--something no one needs for hunting or home defense, but that makes mass shootings far more deadly?

Q38 Red flag laws

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose allowing courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals with serious mental illness who pose a danger to themselves or others, to prevent tragedies before they happen?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose letting courts temporarily take guns away from people who are clearly a danger because of serious mental illness, while making sure law-abiding people aren't unfairly punished or stripped of their rights?

Q39 Assault weapons ban

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose banning the sale of assault weapons to confront toxic gun culture?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose a law that prohibits the sale of military-style rifles but allows the types of weapons used for hunting and home safety?

Abortion

Q57 Abortion access (any reason)

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose allowing access to abortion for any reason?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose making abortion safe and legal, so women can make the decision that's best for their families without the government second-guessing them?

Q58 Abortion up to 15 weeks

NOT WC-RESONANT 1Do you favor or oppose allowing people to get abortions for any reason up to 15 weeks of pregnancy but allow abortion after then only to protect the health and safety of the parent and child?
NOT WC-RESONANT 2Do you favor or oppose allowing people to get abortions for any reason up to 15 weeks of pregnancy but allow abortion after then only to protect the physical safety of the parent and child?
WC-RESONANT 1Do you favor or oppose allowing women to make decisions about abortion that are best for their families up to 15 weeks of pregnancy, with abortion available after then only to protect the health and safety of the mother and child?
WC-RESONANT 2Do you favor or oppose allowing women to make decisions about abortion that are best for their families up to 15 weeks of pregnancy, with abortion available after then only to protect the physical safety of the mother and child.

Environment

Q30 100% clean energy by 2050

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose transitioning to a 100% clean energy economy by 2050, eliminating fossil fuels to address the climate crisis?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose transitioning to a 100% clean economy by 2050, replacing fossil fuels with more efficient forms of energy that lower utility bills, create new local jobs, and better protect workers' and communities' health?

Q31 Modern energy system

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose transitioning to a modern, all-electric energy system that would help to stop climate change while also bringing down energy costs and boosting productivity and economic growth?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose rebuilding our energy system to tackle rising energy costs and pollution while growing the economy and creating millions of good jobs in construction, manufacturing, and energy upgrades across the country--"build, baby, build"?

Q32 Clean energy (China framing)

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose transitioning to a modern, all-electric energy system that would help stop climate change, bring down energy costs, boost productivity and economic growth, and ensure the U.S. can compete with China in the industries of the future?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose rebuilding our energy system to tackle rising energy costs and pollution while growing the economy and creating millions of good jobs in construction, manufacturing, and energy upgrades here at home--rather than sending jobs and investments overseas to China--"build, baby, build"?

Q33 Clean power investments

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose major investments in energy efficiency and cleaner power to reduce pollution and address the climate crisis even if this raises the cost of energy a little?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose major investments in clean power to cut pollution and lower utility bills--without disrupting people's daily routines?

Q34 Prioritize marginalized/coal communities

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose prioritizing marginalized people, particularly Black, brown and indigenous communities most affected by climate change?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose prioritizing projects in coal country and working-class communities across the country that would fuel the next generation of economic growth, like large-scale batteries, lower-carbon cement and steel, and carbon-capture infrastructure?

Q35 Rein in Big Oil

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose decisive climate action now to stop Big Oil from externalizing the costs of fossil fuels while pocketing the profits--leaving families, communities, and taxpayers to pay for pollution, disasters, and rising insurance costs?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose reining in out of control corporations who profit from pollution while working people pay the price--families lose their homes to floods and wildfires, home insurance becomes unaffordable, and mechanics are stuck fixing cars in 117-degree heat?

Q59 Clean grid + nuclear + carbon capture

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We must transition to a clean energy grid by installing wind, solar, and batteries across America, connected together with new transmission lines. New technologies like advanced nuclear reactors and carbon capture will also be critical.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? To reliably power a growing economy and provide long-lasting jobs across the country, we need modern nuclear energy technologies in addition to renewable energy like wind and solar. Coal communities in particular should be prioritized for repowering coal plants as nuclear plants.

Q60 Wind/solar grid

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? We must transition to a clean energy grid by installing wind, solar, and batteries across America, connected together with new transmission lines. We already have the technologies we need; we just need the will to act.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? To reliably power a growing economy, we need wind turbines and solar farms across the American landscape, connected together with new transmission lines. Manufacturing their component parts will provide good jobs, and land owners can earn an income from hosting them.

Care Economy

Q54 Affordable childcare

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose a universal system of subsidized childcare?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose ensuring that all children have access to affordable, high-quality child care so parents don't need to quit jobs they need to support their families.

Q55 Universal pre-K

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose universal pre-K?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose universal pre-K, so all children succeed at school while parents return to work to support their families?

Q56 Child tax credit

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose an $8,000 refundable child tax credit per child, which would dramatically cut child poverty? (Parents could claim a maximum of $16,000.)
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose a child care tax credit of $8,000 per child to help hardworking parents pay childcare or other child-related expenses so they can keep their jobs? (Parents could claim a maximum of $16,000.)

Public Safety

Q47 More police in high-crime areas

WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose putting more well-trained officers in high-crime areas and enforcing strict rules so bad cops face consequences?

Q48 Targeted police + violence interrupters

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose combining targeted police action to stop the small group causing most shootings with community programs to address poverty and structural racism that leads to crime?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose focusing police on the small group causing most shootings and funding programs that keep local kids from getting pulled into trouble?

Q49 Mental health responders (not police)

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose shifting funding from police to address mental health needs, rehabilitation, and the root causes of crime, like poverty and racism?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose sending trained specialists instead of police to respond to non-violent calls like mental-health crises, so police can focus on serious crime?

Democracy

Q50 Trump authoritarian/above law

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? Donald Trump is an authoritarian who is undermining our democracy and the rule of law.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump puts himself above the law, it leads to corruption that raises costs for working people while he and his rich friends get richer.

Q51 Trump ignores limits on power

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? Donald Trump has shown a willingness to ignore constitutional checks and balances and concentrate power in an imperial presidency.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump ignores limits on his power, it creates chaos that hurts workers, small businesses, and family budgets.

Q52 Trump uses govt against critics

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? Donald Trump has used state power to retaliate against critics, raising serious concerns about civil liberties and equal treatment under the law.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump uses government power to punish people and businesses he doesn't like, what results is a rigged system where small businesses and workers lose out while Big Business and powerful insiders get special treatment.

Q53 Trump ignores democratic rules

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump ignores democratic rules and norms, it undermines our institutions, erodes public trust, and creates instability that harms the country as a whole.
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump ignores the rules, it's not just politics--it hits your wallet. Prices rise, jobs feel less secure, and it gets harder for working families to keep up.

Baseline (ANES/CES/GSS-style)

LGBT job discrimination

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose laws to protect gays and lesbians against job discrimination?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose laws that make it illegal to fire someone who works hard and does their job well, just because they are gay or lesbian?

Gay adoption

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you think gay or lesbian couples should be legally permitted to adopt children?
WC-RESONANTDo you think gay and lesbian couples who can provide a stable, loving home should be allowed to adopt children?

Background checks

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose background checks for gun purchases?
WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose requiring a background check for gun purchases, so criminals can't get weapons and families stay safe?

Assault rifle ban

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose banning assault rifles?
WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose banning the sale of military-style rifles, while keeping regular hunting and home-defense guns legal?

Police permit for guns

NOT WC-RESONANTWould you favor or oppose a law which would require a person to obtain a police permit before he or she could buy a gun?
WC-RESONANTWould you favor or oppose a law which would require a person to obtain a police permit before he or she could buy a gun, so criminals and abusers don't get guns but guns remain available for hunters and home safety?

Universal basic income

NOT WC-RESONANTWould you favor or oppose the federal government providing a guaranteed income, sometimes called a universal basic income, of about $1,000 per month for all adults, whether or not they work?
WC-RESONANTWould you favor or oppose the federal government providing a guaranteed income of about $1,000 per month for all adults so that families struggling with job loss due to offshoring, artificial intelligence or other reasons can pay their bills and keep a roof over their families' heads.

Trans athletes (oppose ban)

NOT WC-RESONANTSeveral states have considered laws that would ban transgender girls from participating in K-12 girls' sports. Do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose such a law?
WC-RESONANTSeveral states have considered laws that would allow the government to overrule the decisions of parents and coaches when they allow a child who was born male but lives as a girl to participate in K-12 sports. Do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose such a law?

Path to citizenship

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose, providing a path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants who obey the law, pay a fine, and pass security checks?

Infrastructure spending

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose spending about $150 billion a year for eight years on construction and repair of roads and bridges, rail, public transit, airports, water systems, broadband internet, and the electric grid?
WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose spending about $150 billion a year to rebuild roads, bridges, and infrastructure, creating good-paying jobs, making communities safer, and commuting more reliable?

Expand Medicaid

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose expanding Medicaid to cover individuals making less than $25,000 and families making less than $40,000 a year?
WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose expanding Medicaid so low-income workers and families can get health coverage without going into debt?

Corporate tax

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose raising the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent?
WC-RESONANTDo you support or oppose raising taxes on large corporations so they contribute more to public services and programs Americans rely on?

Medical bill help

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you think it is the responsibility of the federal government to help people pay for doctors and hospital bills, or not?
WC-RESONANTDo you agree or disagree that the federal government should help people cover the cost of medical bills, so people don't go bankrupt if they have steep healthcare expenses?

Border security (oppose)

NOT WC-RESONANTShould federal spending on tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration be increased, decreased, or kept the same?

Paid parental leave

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose requiring employers to offer paid leave to parents of new children?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose requiring employers to offer paid leave so new parents can care for a newborn without losing their paycheck or their job?

Tax millionaires

NOT WC-RESONANTHow much do you favor or oppose increasing income taxes on people making over one million dollars per year?
WC-RESONANTHow much do you favor or oppose increasing income taxes on people making over one million dollars per year? This tax would help fund services that working Americans rely on, including Social Security, federal highways, and the U.S. military.

Free trade (oppose)

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose free trade agreements?
WC-RESONANTDo you favor or oppose free trade agreements that make it easier for companies to move jobs overseas?

Raise minimum wage

NOT WC-RESONANTShould the federal minimum wage be raised, kept the same, lowered but not eliminated, or eliminated altogether?
WC-RESONANTShould the federal minimum wage be raised so that people who work full-time can afford basic necessities like rent, groceries and utilities, or should it be kept the same, lowered, or eliminated?

Welfare spending

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you think federal budget spending on welfare programs should be increased a lot, increased a little, kept the same, or decreased a little?
WC-RESONANTDo you think federal spending to help families with children pay for rent, food and basic needs during hard times should be increased a lot, increased a little, kept the same, or decreased a little?

Environmental regulation

NOT WC-RESONANTWhere would you place yourself on a scale from 1 to 7? 1 = We need much tougher government regulations on business to protect the environment. 7 = Current regulations are already too much of a burden on business.
WC-RESONANTWhere would you place yourself on a scale from 1 to 7? 1 = We need to protect people's health and homes against greed of corporate polluters. 7 = Current regulations are already too much of a burden on business.

Social Security spending

NOT WC-RESONANTDo you think federal spending on Social Security should be increased, kept the same, or decreased?
WC-RESONANTDo you think federal spending on Social Security--which all working people pay into and many retirees rely on to get by--should be increased, kept the same, or decreased?

Notes & caveats

  • Support percentages in the issue cross-tabs are survey-weighted; the n shown when you hover a cell is the unweighted number of respondents behind it.
  • “Progressive” support means each question is oriented so a higher % is the more progressive/left-leaning position—for example, on border security the counted response is opposing an increase in spending.
  • A few questions are reported here but are not part of the report’s aggregate issue figures: “Trump has gone too far” (Q40) and “Biden vs. Trump on immigration” (Q41) are not policy-support questions—one is an agree/disagree about the current administration and the other a head-to-head choice between two presidents—so they are not comparable with the issue-support items; “Open our doors to immigrants” (Q42) and “Immigration helps the economy” (Q43) are set aside because their working-class-resonant wording did not outperform the not-working-class-resonant wording; and “Nuclear energy” (Q59) and “Renewables” (Q60) belong to a separate supplemental energy battery rather than the core climate questions.
  • Subgroup cells based on very few respondents (for example, interactions involving the oversamples) are noisy—treat single- or low-double-digit cells with caution.
  • Race/ethnicity is mutually exclusive: Hispanic/Latino (of any race) first, then non-Hispanic White and Black, then Other/multiple. A non-Hispanic Asian group is part of the sample but is not broken out as its own cross-tab column, because the subgroup is too small for reliable issue-by-issue estimates.