Systematic toplines, subgroup cross-tabulations, and sample composition for the Abbott–Williams Class Gaps Poll. Support percentages are survey-weighted and use the same progressive-coding rules as the report (“Don’t know” kept in the denominator).
Overview
5,770U.S. adults
55survey questions tabulated
±1.4%full-sample MOE
This appendix accompanies the report Class Gaps: Tools for Building Progressive Coalitions by Bridging the Class Divide. For every survey question it reports the weighted share holding the progressive position, broken out by eight dimensions: class group, party ID, race/ethnicity, education, household income, gender, age, and 2024 presidential vote. The two class groups that anchor the report are Working class (middle 50% of income and no four-year degree; n = 1,704) and Liberal college graduates (Democratic-leaning, BA+, top income quartile; n = 617).
How to read the heat tables. Each cell is the weighted % choosing the progressive/supportive response, shaded from pale to teal. Hover a cell for its unweighted n; hover a column header for the full subgroup name. Tables scroll horizontally. “–” = subgroup too small / not estimable.
0%100% support
Methodology
Field dates: January 29–February 17, 2026. Fielded By: Verasight. Mode: online panel.
Sample: 5,770 U.S. adults—a 4,420 nationally representative base plus oversamples of 650 Black, 400 Hispanic/Latino, and 300 high-income adults.
Weighting: raked to December 2025 CPS targets (age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metro status), Pew NPORS partisanship, and 2024 presidential vote. Weight range 0.27–3.82 (mean 1.00).
Full-sample margin of error: ±1.4% (design-effect adjusted).
Coding: each question is scored for the share of respondents taking the progressive/supportive position, using a response scale appropriate to that question. “Don’t know” answers are kept in the denominator, so every percentage is a share of everyone who was asked the question, not only those who gave an opinion.
Framing experiment: most issue questions were randomized so that each respondent saw one of two wordings—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing. Both wordings, and how support differed between them, are shown in the “different wordings tested” panel under each issue.
Question wording: every question links to its full verbatim text—and every wording version it was tested in—in the Question wording section below.
Comparison survey sources
Throughout the report, the 2026 Class Gaps Poll is compared against a large set of pre-existing national surveys. This is the full list those comparisons draw on—the academic benchmark series (ANES, CES/CCES, GSS) plus prior public-opinion polling. All are publicly documented national surveys; the report uses only their published/derived aggregate results (no respondent-level data is redistributed here).
Survey
Year / wave
Organization
ANES Time Series
2024
American National Election Studies (U. Michigan / Stanford)
Cooperative Election Study (CES / CCES) Common Content
“Public Ranks Inflation as the Most Important Issue” survey (SSRS)
Jul 2023
SSRS (via Roper Center, Cornell)
KFF Health Tracking Poll
Sep 2024
KFF / SSRS (via Roper Center, Cornell)
“Wave” numbers (Pew ATP) and field dates (AP-NORC) identify the specific edition of a repeated survey. Items from these sources enter the report only as aggregate, progressive-coded support percentages for benchmarking the Class Gaps Poll; they are not part of its weighting or sample.
Sample & weighting
Unweighted counts and weighted shares for the realized sample. The oversamples make the unweighted race/income composition non-representative by design; the weighted column restores population proportions.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Most questions were asked in more than one wording (a “framing” experiment): each respondent saw one version at random—a working-class-resonant framing or a not working-class-resonant framing—so we can see which wins more support. Each row is one wording version; the percentage is the weighted share supporting it. Gap = liberal college graduates − working class. Click a question number for the full text of each wording.
Baseline (ANES/CES/GSS-style)
The baseline battery is a set of standard policy questions drawn from long-running national surveys (the American National Election Studies, the Cooperative Election Study, and the General Social Survey), asked in their established wording. They serve two purposes: they benchmark this sample against well-known national results, and they provide the plain-wording comparison point for the working-class framing experiments used elsewhere in the survey.
Each respondent saw 10 random pairs from 30 priorities and picked the more important one. Values are the share of head-to-head match-ups each priority won (higher = more prioritized).
Policy priority
All
Working class
Lib. college grads
WC−LCG
Ensuring that basics—like groceries, housing, utilities, health insurance—are affordable
84
86
81
+5
Protecting Social Security and Medicare
74
76
67
+8
Lowering rents and housing costs
68
71
58
+13
Reducing corruption in government
66
68
57
+11
Lowering drug prices for the elderly and low-income people
64
66
53
+13
Protecting subsidies that make health insurance affordable
61
63
68
-5
Raising wages and take-home pay
61
64
54
+9
Protecting Medicaid
57
59
56
+3
Creating jobs
56
56
49
+7
Lowering the crime rate to keep neighborhoods secure
56
59
38
+22
Ensuring that every family has access to affordable childcare
54
53
58
-5
Boosting economic growth
54
53
47
+5
Making college and job training more affordable
52
51
51
-0
Preventing gun violence
52
49
62
-13
Protecting workers from unfair treatment at work
51
50
45
+5
Cracking down on corporate price gouging
50
52
44
+8
Ending racism
49
51
57
-6
Resisting authoritarianism and defending democratic institutions
48
42
75
-33
Ending police misconduct
48
50
45
+5
Raising taxes on the rich
43
42
57
-15
Creating universal pre-K so kids can get early education
39
37
43
-6
Requiring employers to provide paid family leave
39
39
35
+4
Protecting access to abortion
38
37
56
-19
Reining in the power of Big Tech and other large companies
36
33
42
-10
Improving public safety by adding more police
36
38
19
+19
Securing the border
36
39
11
+28
Addressing climate change
34
32
52
-20
Protecting the rights of undocumented immigrants
30
29
42
-13
Protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans
28
24
45
-21
Ending sexism
27
26
29
-2
Race × class
Two complementary race×class breakdowns: how much each group supports the progressive position on each issue, and how it prioritizes policies head-to-head.
Average issue support by race and class
Mean progressive-coded support within each race, for working-class (WC) vs. liberal-college-grad (Elite) respondents of that race. Diff = WC − Elite.
Issue
#Q
White WC
White Elite
White diff
Latino WC
Latino Elite
Latino diff
Black WC
Black Elite
Black diff
Abortion
2
50.8
82.0
-31.3
62.0
85.5
-23.4
63.3
72.5
-9.2
Care Economy
4
70.7
91.2
-20.5
81.9
92.0
-10.0
80.8
89.6
-8.8
Democracy
4
44.7
95.5
-50.8
67.8
96.4
-28.6
69.0
88.1
-19.1
Economic Policy
10
61.0
78.1
-17.1
67.3
78.6
-11.3
71.6
76.4
-4.8
Environment
7
53.2
89.1
-35.9
64.6
87.6
-23.1
64.1
80.3
-16.2
Guns
7
66.6
91.6
-25.0
72.3
90.6
-18.2
66.7
84.0
-17.3
Immigration
8
47.4
87.0
-39.7
65.9
86.3
-20.4
65.4
80.9
-15.5
LGBT/Trans
7
49.7
79.8
-30.1
54.7
77.2
-22.6
48.8
59.8
-11.1
Public Safety
3
67.2
84.0
-16.9
73.8
84.9
-11.1
72.8
75.1
-2.3
Issue priorities by race and class
The same head-to-head priority exercise as above, but with each race split into its working-class (WC) and liberal-college-grad (Elite) respondents. Values are the share of match-ups each priority won within that race×class group; Diff = WC − Elite. Higher = more prioritized. Sorted by White working-class priority.
Policy priority
White WC
White Elite
White diff
Latino WC
Latino Elite
Latino diff
Black WC
Black Elite
Black diff
Ensuring that basics—like groceries, housing, utilities, health insurance—are affordable
86
78
+8
87
80
+7
82
83
-1
Protecting Social Security and Medicare
80
73
+8
68
68
-1
73
58
+15
Reducing corruption in government
71
60
+11
67
49
+18
66
62
+4
Lowering drug prices for the elderly and low-income people
71
48
+23
59
61
-1
62
74
-12
Lowering rents and housing costs
69
55
+14
75
59
+16
71
66
+6
Protecting subsidies that make health insurance affordable
63
68
-5
66
68
-2
62
70
-7
Lowering the crime rate to keep neighborhoods secure
61
32
+29
51
21
+30
63
66
-2
Raising wages and take-home pay
60
52
+8
65
56
+10
70
61
+9
Creating jobs
60
43
+16
51
48
+3
53
60
-7
Protecting Medicaid
59
54
+5
60
70
-10
58
52
+6
Boosting economic growth
57
41
+16
40
54
-14
55
62
-7
Cracking down on corporate price gouging
56
42
+14
55
51
+4
41
42
-0
Securing the border
52
10
+43
25
13
+12
24
9
+15
Ensuring that every family has access to affordable childcare
52
56
-5
56
58
-2
53
56
-3
Protecting workers from unfair treatment at work
48
42
+7
52
56
-5
52
51
+1
Making college and job training more affordable
48
47
+1
52
64
-12
54
52
+1
Preventing gun violence
45
64
-19
54
61
-6
51
59
-8
Improving public safety by adding more police
44
18
+26
34
21
+12
32
19
+12
Ending racism
42
54
-12
51
57
-6
68
66
+2
Ending police misconduct
42
44
-2
51
47
+5
65
48
+18
Raising taxes on the rich
41
59
-18
38
50
-12
43
52
-9
Resisting authoritarianism and defending democratic institutions
41
83
-42
46
68
-22
43
58
-15
Requiring employers to provide paid family leave
39
35
+3
43
26
+16
39
46
-6
Creating universal pre-K so kids can get early education
35
43
-8
38
46
-8
39
47
-9
Reining in the power of Big Tech and other large companies
35
46
-11
36
36
+0
27
30
-4
Protecting access to abortion
34
60
-25
38
54
-16
39
40
-0
Addressing climate change
31
60
-29
36
42
-6
30
42
-12
Ending sexism
25
33
-8
25
17
+8
30
29
+1
Protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans
22
49
-28
27
42
-15
25
27
-2
Protecting the rights of undocumented immigrants
20
43
-23
44
53
-9
32
30
+2
Question wording
Full verbatim text for every question above, including each wording version where the question was randomized. The wordings fall into two camps: a working-class-resonant framing (labeled WC-RESONANT) and not working-class-resonant framings (labeled NOT WC-RESONANT)—comprising the standard survey wording and an abstract, principle- or identity-based wording. Numbered variants (e.g. WC-RESONANT 1, NOT WC-RESONANT 1) are minor splits of the same wording. Each question heading above links here.
Immigration
Q40 Trump gone too far
No frame
Some people say that President Trump has gone too far, with masked men arresting ordinary, hardworking people instead of just deporting criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Q41 Biden vs Trump immigration
No frame
If you had to choose between President Biden's immigration policies and President Trump's, which would you choose?
Q42 Open doors to immigrants
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We have always been a nation of immigrants, and should allow the poor and persecuted to build a better life in the U.S. as a human rights imperative.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We need to open our doors wide to immigrants because most are working-class faith-and-family people who come here to work hard, pay taxes and contribute to their communities.
Q43 Immigration helps economy
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We need immigration because it raises the GDP, and growing the American economy makes the country richer.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Though immigration may hurt wages in a few industries, a blanket ban is self-defeating because it leaves construction sites without laborers, small businesses without dishwashers, and nursing homes with no one to care for grandma.
Q44 Secure borders + legal status
NOT WC-RESONANT 1
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system protects our borders while upholding the human rights of our neighbors and letting them stay in their communities.
NOT WC-RESONANT 2
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system protects our borders while upholding the human rights of immigrants and letting them stay in their communities.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We need secure borders but immigrants should be allowed to stay if they have held jobs, paid taxes, contributed to their communities and stayed out of trouble.
Q45 Legal status for long-term immigrants
NOT WC-RESONANT 1
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system upholds the human rights of our neighbors and lets them stay in their communities.
NOT WC-RESONANT 2
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A just immigration system upholds the human rights of immigrants and lets them stay in their communities.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Immigrants who have held jobs, paid taxes, contributed to their communities and stayed out of trouble for years should be allowed to stay.
Q46 Rein in/abolish ICE
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We should abolish ICE because it's responsible for causing havoc in the streets, terrorizing American communities, and shooting and beating people with no remorse. ICE cannot be "reformed," only dismantled.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We should rein in and restructure federal immigration enforcement to put an end to masked government agents killing civilians and arresting hardworking immigrants who hold jobs, pay taxes, and contribute to their communities.
LGBTQ+ Rights
Q26 LGBT job/housing protection
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose strengthening civil-rights protections to eliminate discrimination against LGBTQIA+ people in employment and housing?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose making it illegal to fire someone or kick them out of their home because they're transgender?
Q27 Gay/lesbian adoption
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose guaranteeing full family equality and protect the parenting rights of LGBTQIA+ families?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose letting gay and lesbian couples adopt if they can give kids a stable, loving home?
Q28 Trans ID recognition
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor ensuring legal gender recognition for transgender people to affirm their autonomy and dignity?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose letting transgender adults update their driver's licenses and other IDs so their paperwork matches how they live, making it easier to work, travel and take care of business?
Q29 Trans girls in sports
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose protecting the full inclusion of transgender girls and women in sports as a matter of equality and basic human dignity?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose letting coaches and families decide whether it's fair for a child who was born male but lives as a girl to play on girls' teams when the child hasn't gone through male puberty and doesn't have the physical advantages boys typically have?
Guns
Q36 Universal background checks
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose requiring universal background checks to address the public-health crisis of gun violence?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose requiring background checks for every gun sale so families can send kids to school and know they'll be safe there?
Q37 Ban high-capacity magazines
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose banning high-capacity ammunition magazines for semi-automatic firearms to better protect communities from gun violence?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose banning high-capacity gun magazines that allow semi-automatic guns fire hundreds of rounds a minute--something no one needs for hunting or home defense, but that makes mass shootings far more deadly?
Q38 Red flag laws
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose allowing courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals with serious mental illness who pose a danger to themselves or others, to prevent tragedies before they happen?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose letting courts temporarily take guns away from people who are clearly a danger because of serious mental illness, while making sure law-abiding people aren't unfairly punished or stripped of their rights?
Q39 Assault weapons ban
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose banning the sale of assault weapons to confront toxic gun culture?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose a law that prohibits the sale of military-style rifles but allows the types of weapons used for hunting and home safety?
Abortion
Q57 Abortion access (any reason)
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose allowing access to abortion for any reason?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose making abortion safe and legal, so women can make the decision that's best for their families without the government second-guessing them?
Q58 Abortion up to 15 weeks
NOT WC-RESONANT 1
Do you favor or oppose allowing people to get abortions for any reason up to 15 weeks of pregnancy but allow abortion after then only to protect the health and safety of the parent and child?
NOT WC-RESONANT 2
Do you favor or oppose allowing people to get abortions for any reason up to 15 weeks of pregnancy but allow abortion after then only to protect the physical safety of the parent and child?
WC-RESONANT 1
Do you favor or oppose allowing women to make decisions about abortion that are best for their families up to 15 weeks of pregnancy, with abortion available after then only to protect the health and safety of the mother and child?
WC-RESONANT 2
Do you favor or oppose allowing women to make decisions about abortion that are best for their families up to 15 weeks of pregnancy, with abortion available after then only to protect the physical safety of the mother and child.
Environment
Q30 100% clean energy by 2050
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose transitioning to a 100% clean energy economy by 2050, eliminating fossil fuels to address the climate crisis?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose transitioning to a 100% clean economy by 2050, replacing fossil fuels with more efficient forms of energy that lower utility bills, create new local jobs, and better protect workers' and communities' health?
Q31 Modern energy system
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose transitioning to a modern, all-electric energy system that would help to stop climate change while also bringing down energy costs and boosting productivity and economic growth?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose rebuilding our energy system to tackle rising energy costs and pollution while growing the economy and creating millions of good jobs in construction, manufacturing, and energy upgrades across the country--"build, baby, build"?
Q32 Clean energy (China framing)
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose transitioning to a modern, all-electric energy system that would help stop climate change, bring down energy costs, boost productivity and economic growth, and ensure the U.S. can compete with China in the industries of the future?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose rebuilding our energy system to tackle rising energy costs and pollution while growing the economy and creating millions of good jobs in construction, manufacturing, and energy upgrades here at home--rather than sending jobs and investments overseas to China--"build, baby, build"?
Q33 Clean power investments
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose major investments in energy efficiency and cleaner power to reduce pollution and address the climate crisis even if this raises the cost of energy a little?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose major investments in clean power to cut pollution and lower utility bills--without disrupting people's daily routines?
Q34 Prioritize marginalized/coal communities
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose prioritizing marginalized people, particularly Black, brown and indigenous communities most affected by climate change?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose prioritizing projects in coal country and working-class communities across the country that would fuel the next generation of economic growth, like large-scale batteries, lower-carbon cement and steel, and carbon-capture infrastructure?
Q35 Rein in Big Oil
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose decisive climate action now to stop Big Oil from externalizing the costs of fossil fuels while pocketing the profits--leaving families, communities, and taxpayers to pay for pollution, disasters, and rising insurance costs?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose reining in out of control corporations who profit from pollution while working people pay the price--families lose their homes to floods and wildfires, home insurance becomes unaffordable, and mechanics are stuck fixing cars in 117-degree heat?
Q59 Clean grid + nuclear + carbon capture
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We must transition to a clean energy grid by installing wind, solar, and batteries across America, connected together with new transmission lines. New technologies like advanced nuclear reactors and carbon capture will also be critical.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To reliably power a growing economy and provide long-lasting jobs across the country, we need modern nuclear energy technologies in addition to renewable energy like wind and solar. Coal communities in particular should be prioritized for repowering coal plants as nuclear plants.
Q60 Wind/solar grid
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We must transition to a clean energy grid by installing wind, solar, and batteries across America, connected together with new transmission lines. We already have the technologies we need; we just need the will to act.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To reliably power a growing economy, we need wind turbines and solar farms across the American landscape, connected together with new transmission lines. Manufacturing their component parts will provide good jobs, and land owners can earn an income from hosting them.
Care Economy
Q54 Affordable childcare
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose a universal system of subsidized childcare?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose ensuring that all children have access to affordable, high-quality child care so parents don't need to quit jobs they need to support their families.
Q55 Universal pre-K
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose universal pre-K?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose universal pre-K, so all children succeed at school while parents return to work to support their families?
Q56 Child tax credit
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose an $8,000 refundable child tax credit per child, which would dramatically cut child poverty? (Parents could claim a maximum of $16,000.)
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose a child care tax credit of $8,000 per child to help hardworking parents pay childcare or other child-related expenses so they can keep their jobs? (Parents could claim a maximum of $16,000.)
Public Safety
Q47 More police in high-crime areas
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose putting more well-trained officers in high-crime areas and enforcing strict rules so bad cops face consequences?
Q48 Targeted police + violence interrupters
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose combining targeted police action to stop the small group causing most shootings with community programs to address poverty and structural racism that leads to crime?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose focusing police on the small group causing most shootings and funding programs that keep local kids from getting pulled into trouble?
Q49 Mental health responders (not police)
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose shifting funding from police to address mental health needs, rehabilitation, and the root causes of crime, like poverty and racism?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose sending trained specialists instead of police to respond to non-violent calls like mental-health crises, so police can focus on serious crime?
Democracy
Q50 Trump authoritarian/above law
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Donald Trump is an authoritarian who is undermining our democracy and the rule of law.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump puts himself above the law, it leads to corruption that raises costs for working people while he and his rich friends get richer.
Q51 Trump ignores limits on power
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Donald Trump has shown a willingness to ignore constitutional checks and balances and concentrate power in an imperial presidency.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump ignores limits on his power, it creates chaos that hurts workers, small businesses, and family budgets.
Q52 Trump uses govt against critics
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Donald Trump has used state power to retaliate against critics, raising serious concerns about civil liberties and equal treatment under the law.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump uses government power to punish people and businesses he doesn't like, what results is a rigged system where small businesses and workers lose out while Big Business and powerful insiders get special treatment.
Q53 Trump ignores democratic rules
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump ignores democratic rules and norms, it undermines our institutions, erodes public trust, and creates instability that harms the country as a whole.
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When Donald Trump ignores the rules, it's not just politics--it hits your wallet. Prices rise, jobs feel less secure, and it gets harder for working families to keep up.
Baseline (ANES/CES/GSS-style)
LGBT job discrimination
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose laws to protect gays and lesbians against job discrimination?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose laws that make it illegal to fire someone who works hard and does their job well, just because they are gay or lesbian?
Gay adoption
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you think gay or lesbian couples should be legally permitted to adopt children?
WC-RESONANT
Do you think gay and lesbian couples who can provide a stable, loving home should be allowed to adopt children?
Background checks
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose background checks for gun purchases?
WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose requiring a background check for gun purchases, so criminals can't get weapons and families stay safe?
Assault rifle ban
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose banning assault rifles?
WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose banning the sale of military-style rifles, while keeping regular hunting and home-defense guns legal?
Police permit for guns
NOT WC-RESONANT
Would you favor or oppose a law which would require a person to obtain a police permit before he or she could buy a gun?
WC-RESONANT
Would you favor or oppose a law which would require a person to obtain a police permit before he or she could buy a gun, so criminals and abusers don't get guns but guns remain available for hunters and home safety?
Universal basic income
NOT WC-RESONANT
Would you favor or oppose the federal government providing a guaranteed income, sometimes called a universal basic income, of about $1,000 per month for all adults, whether or not they work?
WC-RESONANT
Would you favor or oppose the federal government providing a guaranteed income of about $1,000 per month for all adults so that families struggling with job loss due to offshoring, artificial intelligence or other reasons can pay their bills and keep a roof over their families' heads.
Trans athletes (oppose ban)
NOT WC-RESONANT
Several states have considered laws that would ban transgender girls from participating in K-12 girls' sports. Do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose such a law?
WC-RESONANT
Several states have considered laws that would allow the government to overrule the decisions of parents and coaches when they allow a child who was born male but lives as a girl to participate in K-12 sports. Do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose such a law?
Path to citizenship
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose, providing a path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants who obey the law, pay a fine, and pass security checks?
Infrastructure spending
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose spending about $150 billion a year for eight years on construction and repair of roads and bridges, rail, public transit, airports, water systems, broadband internet, and the electric grid?
WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose spending about $150 billion a year to rebuild roads, bridges, and infrastructure, creating good-paying jobs, making communities safer, and commuting more reliable?
Expand Medicaid
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose expanding Medicaid to cover individuals making less than $25,000 and families making less than $40,000 a year?
WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose expanding Medicaid so low-income workers and families can get health coverage without going into debt?
Corporate tax
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose raising the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent?
WC-RESONANT
Do you support or oppose raising taxes on large corporations so they contribute more to public services and programs Americans rely on?
Medical bill help
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you think it is the responsibility of the federal government to help people pay for doctors and hospital bills, or not?
WC-RESONANT
Do you agree or disagree that the federal government should help people cover the cost of medical bills, so people don't go bankrupt if they have steep healthcare expenses?
Border security (oppose)
NOT WC-RESONANT
Should federal spending on tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration be increased, decreased, or kept the same?
Paid parental leave
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose requiring employers to offer paid leave to parents of new children?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose requiring employers to offer paid leave so new parents can care for a newborn without losing their paycheck or their job?
Tax millionaires
NOT WC-RESONANT
How much do you favor or oppose increasing income taxes on people making over one million dollars per year?
WC-RESONANT
How much do you favor or oppose increasing income taxes on people making over one million dollars per year? This tax would help fund services that working Americans rely on, including Social Security, federal highways, and the U.S. military.
Free trade (oppose)
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose free trade agreements?
WC-RESONANT
Do you favor or oppose free trade agreements that make it easier for companies to move jobs overseas?
Raise minimum wage
NOT WC-RESONANT
Should the federal minimum wage be raised, kept the same, lowered but not eliminated, or eliminated altogether?
WC-RESONANT
Should the federal minimum wage be raised so that people who work full-time can afford basic necessities like rent, groceries and utilities, or should it be kept the same, lowered, or eliminated?
Welfare spending
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you think federal budget spending on welfare programs should be increased a lot, increased a little, kept the same, or decreased a little?
WC-RESONANT
Do you think federal spending to help families with children pay for rent, food and basic needs during hard times should be increased a lot, increased a little, kept the same, or decreased a little?
Environmental regulation
NOT WC-RESONANT
Where would you place yourself on a scale from 1 to 7? 1 = We need much tougher government regulations on business to protect the environment. 7 = Current regulations are already too much of a burden on business.
WC-RESONANT
Where would you place yourself on a scale from 1 to 7? 1 = We need to protect people's health and homes against greed of corporate polluters. 7 = Current regulations are already too much of a burden on business.
Social Security spending
NOT WC-RESONANT
Do you think federal spending on Social Security should be increased, kept the same, or decreased?
WC-RESONANT
Do you think federal spending on Social Security--which all working people pay into and many retirees rely on to get by--should be increased, kept the same, or decreased?
Notes & caveats
Support percentages in the issue cross-tabs are survey-weighted; the n shown when you hover a cell is the unweighted number of respondents behind it.
“Progressive” support means each question is oriented so a higher % is the more progressive/left-leaning position—for example, on border security the counted response is opposing an increase in spending.
A few questions are reported here but are not part of the report’s aggregate issue figures: “Trump has gone too far” (Q40) and “Biden vs. Trump on immigration” (Q41) are not policy-support questions—one is an agree/disagree about the current administration and the other a head-to-head choice between two presidents—so they are not comparable with the issue-support items; “Open our doors to immigrants” (Q42) and “Immigration helps the economy” (Q43) are set aside because their working-class-resonant wording did not outperform the not-working-class-resonant wording; and “Nuclear energy” (Q59) and “Renewables” (Q60) belong to a separate supplemental energy battery rather than the core climate questions.
Subgroup cells based on very few respondents (for example, interactions involving the oversamples) are noisy—treat single- or low-double-digit cells with caution.
Race/ethnicity is mutually exclusive: Hispanic/Latino (of any race) first, then non-Hispanic White and Black, then Other/multiple. A non-Hispanic Asian group is part of the sample but is not broken out as its own cross-tab column, because the subgroup is too small for reliable issue-by-issue estimates.